Classic cartoon fans were never friends of John K
Breaking down their true relationship to john, cartoons and the world with my spiritual understanding.
Classic cartoon fans, as I described in my previous article about them, discuss Golden Age cartoons and others such as by Ralph Bakshi and anime creators such as by Tezuka. As I expound upon I believe their whole hobby is insincere, and the real purpose of it is to fill the absurdity of a hypothetical world where there was no Enthusiast class for one of the most popular forms of entertainment in the world, the cartoony cartoon. And this is true for important spiritual reasons.
They never cared about truly appreciating cartoons or forming a real tradition, and this activity of theirs constitutes a sort of abortion of another type of hypothetical world where there are actual genuine animation enthusiasts, for both classic cartoons as well as the cartoons that can be made in the future. (there are many complexities to the context of this dreary culture) Merely speaking of cartoons that can be made begins to illustrate the issue. Creativity of the murky Darkness, the 5th dimensional future and grasping it, these are things of the true African culture which comics and cartoons take place in, whether they want to or not.
They claimed to have a sort of respect for the accomplishments of John Kricfalusi, for what he made and helped innovate, and for his criticism and takes about modern animation, but they never did.
They were eager to dump all responsibility for revolutionizing animation in the 90s to anybody else. They respected Genndy Tartakovsky, but did not acknowledge that he unlearned the cliches he learned from CalArts with direct inspiration from spumco Ren and Stimpy, Dexter in his student film sounding like Ren. They respected Bruce Timm, but hardly gestured towards how incredibly indebted he was to the various efforts of John. I did not know myself as a teenager that Bruce Timm was one of John's proteges on his various projects. When you begin to take all the factors into account, sincerely and honestly without any bullshit recoiling from the facts, John begins to seem like not only a master of animation, but a Grandmaster, a special classification of an accomplished artist throughout history. Bob Clampett could be considered one as well. Most likely there are no others in the animation history ccfs pretended to care about.
There are a number of Curiosities about classic cartoon fans. Their own attempts to learn how to draw like classic cartoons are ungodly hideous. I remember looking at their efforts on forums and they looked like nightmares which were products of nightmare lives, and they praised each other for what they did. In the current day, the art of my trolls can also serve as an example, who never got to develop into full phony animation enthusiasts, shooting at me with little tidbits of obnoxious words.
They are completely insulated, shut off from reality, advocating for no cultural change. Treating the actually good cartoons like museums, they portray the efforts of Bob Clampett, Chuck jones, Rod Scribner, and others like a mountain towering over the field of modern animation, who toil in peace with no ability to reach the mountain top and climb still further into the sky. They were already preparing for the classic cartoon to be forgotten as it was especially in 2012, When Tumblr declared that all art before that year was offensive, though they were subtle about it at first. All vipers, all conspiring and full of cunning to accomplish goals no one ever wants to acknowledge.
Though they affect strong artistic principles, as amid Amidi did with CartoonBrew, they collapse one year or another without them ever looking back to Lament, no commentary on their own cowardice as a community or individually, only some tidbits from myself over the years. This serves the purpose of making it looked like there are already people who really care about the art of cartoons, until things progress and (they hope) the whole issue falls through.
The effect cartoons have on kids, whether classic/good or modern/bad, is almost entirely ignored. What they do say on the subject goes on in almost pornographic detail about how kids are braindead and don't care about what they're looking at. The whole animation Community comes together to insist that kids will like whatever they see growing up and remember it fondly as adults, setting the stage for the Advent of full on grooming around the year 2012. Attracting depraved and deranged individuals, as subjected to me to harsh online treatment since covid restrictions started, who want to have whatever impact on the minds of kids and the adults they grow up into they want. Behind the timid and self-absorbed exterior, all the various subgroups of the animation Community are shaking hands.
Largely this all comes from Evil Manchildren - those who leave childhood set in a negative relationship with the trickster, Lord of Africa and thus Lord of comics and cartoons, which resembles a more minor form of damnation in this world. Their Inner Childs drive all this insane false mischief and devious cunning without involving the conscious thoughts of their minds. A major reason why they love to say “What?!” - acting as if no conscious knowledge means no knowledge - and slinging around accusations of pedophilia at anybody who actually cares about cartoons - as if only some perversity could draw one to knowledge of the heartless children Within.
Well there is an obvious reason to our unconscious minds - everybody associated with Africa is drawn to such knowledge and reacting to it. Which is why the animation industry insists the two spider-verse movies so far are unparalleled advancements in the field of Animation worldwide, even though the new trailer from today is full-out ugly and pointlessly stupid. They need to say it. To keep all That at bay.
And so by intentional action classic cartoon fans became themselves and set up the field of Animation to fail - most of all the legendary African figure from pre-history associated with the cancer sign, a metaphysical cartoon with a few dozen layers of meaning. ♋️
Original sin brought cancer and they treated this figure like the corruption of cancer, which itself symbolizes on the level of the spirit of an individual that true cartooning and everything associated must be treated like an aberration with no natural meaning. And so it is exposed how Satan and his followers cleverly use the consequences of their actions against God to attempt the advancement of their interests, though all doomed to futility.
And so all this explains the demented animation culture I was born in, worse than in any timeline of the upcoming multiverse. Without even a single narrative for myself besides bizarre references that try to act as if I am unimportant, even if the people who make them make them about me every single day of their lives. They have something important to accomplish for Satan despite that it will never bear fruit. They are managers of weeds, and my web comic will spark kindling.
Classic cartoon fans are much more redeemable than modern cartoon fans, but it doesn't say much. They all carry the heft of the millstone penalty on their shoulders Jesus spoke about, panicked and fearful of being sent to the Bottom of the Sea.
All this also explains how they become Artful Dodgers of ever lending someone who fits my exact description to any degree support. Even those more respectable figures like the “John K Respecter” ultimately seek to undermine efforts to genuinely progress further into the potential of animation, exhibiting the same effect from reading my posts as John's readers near the end of my attempted artistic Revolution desperately scrambling from criticizing modern cartoons any further, lest they broach all That they avoid. Their kabuki theater ending.
Thad wrote sick little monkeys which is supposed to be the true, accurate and non-selfaggrandizing history of Spumco. ( I still don't know if that caricature from John's blog was actually of Thad or that was a whole load of projection dumped on it by CCFs. There are certainly various varieties of Internet trolls and new ones for today, like the groomer who calls John or me a groomer.) And yet he is not willing to give the true, accurate and non-aggrandizing history of modern cartoons. And yet he is not willing to speak about how different The Narrative about John was by his accusers before 2018, even shortly before Katie Rice cringing at the APC intros rather than treating it like a sex crime. He can't handle that level of based. None of them can, you start seeing things.
So did John K fall from Grace amongst those involved with classic cartoons? Their attitude about him never changed. It's just like with the people who have turned towards supporting grooming about sex and gender Theory and the false woke ideas of race. In public schools, on social media, in animation and in other places. Did their attitude change about the purpose of sex, about God, about Society, about the selfish goals of their beliefs? No. They just developed over the decades since the sexual hedonism and false acceptance and love of the hippies, which themselves developed from Anglicans accepting contraception and the legalization of abortion, things driven with intent against the Return of Black Culture, based on what they had begun to understand about Africa.
So, too, did ccfs develop about John. They haven't really changed how they speak of him at all, though they do so less often. It's all just a bad show for the many ignorant children and poorly developed adults they come in contact with online. Not only that, but on the communal level which they pretend does not exist in human interaction (it proceeds into how all people would develop in their relationship to the Trickster into adulthood if the diminished black domain of Earth did not depart with the end of childhood) they directly encouraged beforehand some of the many girls who are strangely attracted to John to make some phony sex stories about him, using stories that had been made up about my teenage self they never cared about helping. Though they were implicitly eager from the start to make me look obsessed with things like maximizing credit for John's accomplishments from how I needed to correct them, when they simply get out of the way of ever approaching honesty and sincere appreciation for what has been done.
Their activities are not only about how things were with John and cartoons like Looney Tunes, they are also about anticipating factors like myself, even myself when I will be about 35. And yet here I am dismantling their evil Shadow Game and beginning with the true offensive for the restoration of what John and the Looney Tunes represent, which people know even when they make "bad movies” like Space Jam, without the slightest concern for trying to please classic cartoon fans, or wasting my prayers on them. I'm sure they have nurtured many great personal relationships as after all cartoons proceed to profound forms of relationships, they can get them all from those. And everything else, now and in eternity.
