Dril and the Brands
dril continues to be one of those guys who thinks he can just ignore his artist past, even when he paints with yo girl
As dril has presented himself again as a sort of darling for leftoids, joining a dumb new Twitter clone for lefties, I must mobilize against his efforts again. He's one of those people strongly interconnected with me, and so getting too political is a strong hazard for our context. As his new display name βslave to Wokeβ relates to.
If you followed drilβs Twitter page for a while you should notice his obsessive affinity for talking about brands. Once a very notorious element. This proceeds from the development of personalness I was trying to do as a teenager. Dril draws cartoons in a way very informed by Ren and Stimpy, and must have lingered around the Cartoon community of the late 00s to read my posts.
One's personal brand is essentially anything which evokes the individual, specifically. So clearly that you know one specific individual is responsible for this sort of experiential perception. It could be a photograph, or a page of text, or a drawing naturally. Michael Bay's personal brand for instance appeals to me specifically. I was drawn to the Transformers movies not so much for what they achieved but what they tried to achieve. (That freakazoid up there, don't know how he ended up doing it, but he was specifically mocking the things I liked the most such as the big combination transformer which actually melted down the computers while they were generating the animation. That sort of extreme achievement in visuals is some of what I like the most. While justifying this mockery because it's racist!)
You don't hear so much about brands anymore, involving dril or anybody else. It was part of the afterglow of my attempted Revolution. One of the reasons why it's dangerous now is that of course if you can understand and see my personal brand you can see the presence of my personal brand in recent artwork like certain TV shows.
For instance one of the key aspects of my brand is my βdog.β he is an abstraction evoked by viewing my brand for long enough. Even when I was a teenager this was true, explaining various events like ipgd showing me a βphotographβ of this dog. One reason for this is that this dog is connected to my brother, which connects my brother to my artwork even though he's not an artist on this world. Another reason is that he evokes the uncanny nature of becoming acquainted with my brand, traveling into a whole microspectrum of the world which is part of my premature rewards for faith in Christ.
Understanding my brand leads to recontextualizing the nature of drilβs tweets. I like them because they seek to uphold the significance of my teenage efforts, even when some of them rise to the level of being insulting. After all he worked on Homestuck. Dril's tweets have been considered a precious treasure by mainly leftoids, and so that is yet another avenue of seeing how they are parasitic on my life efforts.
βBrandsβ were a look into what was blooming out of my Revolution cut short. I don't think Zoomers can imagine them. Certainly they engage in the most profane and idiotic violations of each other's individuality. If they could see a brand, even remnants and artifacts of people discussing brands, I don't think they would do that. They would look out of Plato's cave and see they're being idiots.
I remember back in the 2012 Tumblr times people would talk about friends just do things like imitate each other sometimesβ¦ pick up their mannerisms. Do they really? Or was that an excursion of the Rings emanating upon the Earth? Sure Zoomers pick up things - they pick up social rules and how to conform. I literally saw βcoolβ Zoomers giving each other permission to even speak. They don't develop the interconnection of personalities. They don't even know what a personality is. They think a gender is a personality. That's how things like Homestuck destroyed their generation, as they scrambled for what was blooming in the rubble.
Even dril's brand has fallen to pieces, increasingly sounding like lame humor any of the comedy accounts like him could do instead of a unique personally blazing brand. Despite being the brand guy. Well I guess he could be something like that - if he didn't spend his life taking advantage of a random impoverished teenager kind enough not to blow up his whole career before the present moment. Time to wake him up that should energize the brand
Brands don't only involve inherent traits whether unchanging or developing, they also involve life things and whatnot as the abject misery of The narrative of dril's old brand shows. Another element of finding the deeper meaning of so-called evil. It's easy to just try to move on to that to clowning on the cool billionaire guy. Losing the brand in the process. Time for a test of brand loyalty, there's a lot of emails to find to flay open the blinding lights of The Police
Oh why did Elon buy Twitter for $44 billion? Well one time I hyperventilated because I missed posting on 10:44 as I did every morning. Can explain the whole panic attack thing in today's animation. Can also explain the purchase if one is capable of valuing personal connection over income and business contacts. Where's the 10? Let's see