The art Industries' Online Bridges
I expose "burning bridges" as a tool of oppression towards those who build things for the art Industries online.
Before some years ago the comics and cartoons community and various other art communities used to be gleeful in reminding others that “burning Bridges” would ruin their chances for art careers, meaning not being perfectly nice and accommodating to them. Simply having a personal grievance with an artist counted as “burning a bridge,” even if it was valid. for example, I suffered as a kid to be left alone watching cartoons getting worse and worse over years, and no one wanted to hear my grievances about that misery.
They always missed how exactly these Bridges were formed, usually intentionally. They built fan bases online. They viewed work online as well as comments. They received support and brainstormed ideas. And so on and so forth. The chains of interaction and connection can be very intricate - and yet they claimed if you wanted to establish yourself in an industry after participating in these … you were starting over from ground zero.

As explained previously, the whole bridge metaphor is racist. It refers to the African dimension of the world that interweaves creativity into a spiritual expanse. The Trickster decides who gets to participate and reach prominence in this expanse, not the hurt feelings of the privileged.
The whole reason they had the pretension that things were otherwise is that the African dimension was underutilized, which was of course a trick. The true meaning of artwork does not take place without this dimension, and so within industry artwork we see a lot of meaningless things being produced, self-interested therapy and corporate slop. Resuming not speaking for the trickster

The racist significance of hurt feelings is that proper feelings are oriented according to the spiritual dimensions, but because of sin these feelings are damaged. They can be discovered and cleaned, however, with faith.
Furthermore, the hurt feelings of those they exclude are much more legitimate because they can feel that they contributed many things to the art industries through their online activity, and all of that is treated as if it had no value even as it gives much value to careers across all of these contributions. This cultural convention was always a subversive ‘middle finger’ trolling outsiders for expecting proper things from the art Industries.
Now I give an example of how easy this value can be to miss. Andrew took reader suggestions which is a notable example of how online contributions are disregarded in general.
One of the first suggestions he used was this comical fake name for John. However it has the value of later inspiring Tavros’ ancestor, one of the legendary forebears of the main trolls. This character symbolically represents having powers of connection with animals as well as a childhood revolution. I cared a lot about animals to the point that I started treating mainstream humans in the same way that mainstream science treated animals, a Superior alternative to PETA nonsense to get people to reconsider their relationship with animals.
John represented my human life, but this prompt connected into my Beast life amongst Underbeasts that can be animalistic and other savage beasts. His readers already had awareness of my special existence in alternate dimensions because of my Revolution, and Andrew used this awareness.

Of course I have been victimized most of all by the “Burning Bridges” convention. As I sent my emails I thrilled in knowing that their culture has absolutely nothing it can respond with to my messaging tactics, as amongst all the bridges they burnt for me I have no options but to be laughed at for my woes as people attack me showing any signs of life, or going against the industries. of course I chose the latter option, but any sane person should.
My new video addressing Ren and Stimpy fandom’s role in ensuring that bridges for me to use can't be built while they pretend to enjoy the show and a few fragments of John's philosophy intermixed with tons of lies.
When people comment, form relationships, and otherwise interact online they are supporting the construction of bridges. Because of this truth the animation industry is incredibly threatened by me simply having a normal interaction online.
Interwoven with their movement into the industries is a variety of personal things. People use comments to develop their work, they use online support, they use the cultures of websites, they use notable developers of artistic ideas, they use aesthetics and abstract progressions of online art communities, and so on and so forth. On the basis of all these things it should be easy for me or anybody who's been participating for years to establish some relationships and an artistic income and career if they want one. But people preferred greed.


People worshiped “separate the art from the artist” for a while, but that fell off too. There's a big lesson to learn that artwork is not a job, it is personal expression, and its proper nature should not be ruined to make it more like a job, treating online forums like mines and if the dragon comes back for its gems (in my instance representing a human who is associated from birth with Rings, BTW) trying to gaslight it until it consumes their greedy, bad-drawing kingdom in fire.